Left Shadow
Right Shadow
Pilot Insurance Center

Select Airparts is one of the largest independent Beechcraft, Hawker and Raytheon parts distributors in the world. Our specialty is supplying quality OEM and PMA parts for the both the Hawker family of business jets and the complete Beechcraft line. This includes the Hawker 400, 600, 700, 800 and 1000 as well as the Beechcraft family of twin-engine corporate and executive aircraft, including the King Air (all models 90 through 350), Queen Air, Beech 99, Beech 1900, Baron, Bonanza, Duke and the Premier.

Homeland Security Deploys Predator in Texas

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will initiate Predator Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) flights out of Corpus Christi, Texas, beginning on Wednesday, according to a DHS press release.
Flights will cover the Texas stretch of the U.S.-Mexico border, which means that aerial surveillance of the entire border, from California to Texas, is now complete.



"With the deployment of the Predator in Texas, we will now be able to cover the Southwest border from the El Centro sector in California all the way to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas, providing critical aerial surveillance assistance to personnel on the ground," DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano stated on Monday, according to a Reuters report.

The deployment comes just weeks after President Obama’s signing of the Southwest Border Security Bill, a supplement to the administration’s Southwest Border Initiative, which provides funding for beefing up border security, including the deployment of additional reconnaissance aircraft.
Obama sees the recent law as the latest step in securing communities of the Southwest, and a means to “strengthen our partnership with Mexico in targeting the gangs and criminal organizations that operate on both sides of our shared border.”

According to the DHS, the recent legislation provides “$600 million in new funding to enhance security technology at the border, share information, and support with state, local, and tribal law enforcement, and increase federal law enforcement activities at the border.”

Part of this technology funding includes biometric information systems, used to identify and remove “criminal aliens” from among detained illegal immigrants.

DHS information heralds the Obama administration’s expansion of such systems—part of the “Secure Communities” initiative—from 14 to 567 locations, including all Southwest border jurisdictions, and projects that biometric information systems will be deployed nationwide by 2013.

The ramp-up of law enforcement personnel is described as “the deployment of more agents, investigators, and prosecutors as part of a coordinated effort with states and cities to target illicit networks trafficking in people, drugs, illegal weapons, and money.”

This includes spending $176 million “for an additional 1,000 Border Patrol agents to be deployed between ports of entry,” as well as $68 million to hire 250 new Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents, and $6 million to construct two forward-operating bases along the Southwest border, to coordinate forward activities.

The Southwest Border Security Bill also allows for the president to deploy an additional 1,200 National Guard troops to the border. Some began to arrive in Arizona this week.






Gulfstream proclaims success in G650 dive test

By John Croft


Gulfstream says its first prototype G650 business jet has successfully passed high-speed flutter testing, a key hurdle in meeting the planned certification of the 7,000nm (13,000km) range, fly-by-wire, Rolls-Royce BR725-powered twinjet next year.

Flutter testing uses exciters to input disturbances ranging in frequency from 2Hz to 58Hz to the wings, tail and flight-control surfaces with the aircraft flying at various altitudes, speeds, weights and centre-of-gravity conditions. Aircraft are designed so that the components naturally dampen out the oscillations without actions by the pilots.

In the most recent flutter tests, which are ongoing, Gulfstream test pilots pitched S/N 6001's nose down to as much as 18° below the horizon to reach a speed of Mach 0.995 with the exciters activated. "The demonstrated flutter margins met or exceeded our expectations out to maximum speeds," says Pre Henne, Gulfstream's senior vice-president of programmes, engineering and test. "That's a good sign." The G650 is set to be the world's fastest production business jet, with a maximum cruise speed of M0.925.



Senior experimental test pilot Thomas Horne says aircraft control was predictable. "It's easy to control and to get precise control at those speeds," says Horne. "The airplane response has matched the expectations of our engineers, and we've been able to easily fly the test conditions and march through the test plan."

As of late August, Gulfstream had four of the eventual five flight-test aircraft flying, accumulating 575h of the 1,800h of flight testing scheduled for the certification programme. S/N 6001 is dedicated to envelope expansion, air data calibration, flutter, in-flight performance and flight controls, while S/N 6002 is being used to evaluate the aircraft's systems as well as take-off and landing performance.

S/N 6003 is being used for avionics tests, in-flight load measurement and ice protection systems operations. S/N 6004, a cabin test aircraft, has joined the fleet but is being outfitted with a full interior. S/N 6005, which has completed initial phase manufacturing and begun engine testing, will be used for reduced vertical separation minimum (RVSM) testing upon completion.

Gulfstream also reports that it has developed a web-based system to reduce the time required to attain a US Federal Aviation Administration letter of authorisation needed to fly business jets at RVSM altitudes - above 29,000ft (8.850m).

The company says the capability is only used internally for Gulfstream aircraft, but may later be made available to customers. Gulfstream says electronic process can reduce the authorisation time from two weeks to "just a few days".

LSA, IFR, And IMC: An Update

For a while now, an ASTM committee that develops the standards for light sport aircraft to operate under instrument flight rules has struggled to reach consensus on a key point -- whether Special-LSAs should be allowed to fly in actual instrument meteorological conditions -- and although the committee members still disagree, they have decided to move forward and change the standards to prohibit the use of S-LSAs in IMC. That proposed change now must go through some further approvals and then be submitted to the FAA for an OK before it takes effect. That process could take until the end of this year or perhaps longer, Dan Johnson, chairman of the Light Aircraft Manufacturing Association, told AVweb on Wednesday. The change will not be retroactive, Johnson said. Any S-LSA that is flying today, or that is built before the new standard takes effect, is not prohibited from IMC flight if the aircraft is properly equipped and flown by a qualified pilot (although manufacturers may choose to prohibit IMC flight in their aircraft even when the ASTM standard allows it).

The IMC change is driven more by committee members' concerns about liability than about safety, Johnson said. FAA officials have not expressed any safety concerns about LSAs operating in instrument conditions, he said. "This is a complex topic that will continue to stimulate debate," Johnson wrote at his blog. The important fact to remember, he said, is that the change is not retroactive. Johnson further told AVweb that under the ASTM process, the standard could change again in the future, in as little as 30 days, if a new consensus is reached on the issue.

PolyMax Floor Coverings Does It Again!



POLYMAX 5000AC HANGAR FLOOR COATING SYSTEM

 Exceptional Adhesion, No Tire Lifting.

 Excellent Chemical Resistance, No Tire Staining.

Engineered To Withstand Heavy Wheeled Traffic.

PolyMax 5000AC is a three coat, 21 mil system that includes a high gloss,
light reflective urethane finish that is not affected by direct sunlight (UV stable)
and out-performs paint and thin film coatings.

The PolyMax 5000AC Hangar Floor Coating System has exceptional
adhesion to concrete, which prevents tire lifting; has excellent chemical
resistance, thereby eliminating tire staining and damage by Skydrol and other
aviation fuels; and is designed to withstand heavy wheeled traffic.

In addition, PolyMax 5000AC Floor Coating creates an attractive and
durable floor for aviation facilities in hangars, work shops and storage areas.





Visit us at NBAA Booth 7431
For more information about the entire PolyMax line of flooring systems,
 visit our website www.PolyMax-us.com
Call Joanne Kontorchik at 405-755-8454 … or e-mail


Teen Completes Solo to West Coast

Nate Foster, 17, back home after flying two-seat aircraft from Ocean City to Pacific coast. Foster felt a joy unlike anything he'd experienced in his 17 years as the mist broke to reveal the endless blue of the Pacific Ocean.

For six days, the Reisterstown teenager had glided over mountains and deserts in his two-seat, Piper Super Cub aircraft. The flight began in Ocean City and finally, on Saturday morning, another coast was in sight.

"It's indescribable how happy I felt to see the Pacific," he said Monday after a commercial flight home from California, where he completed his cross-country flight in the seaside town of Monterey.

Yingling gets FAA approval on Skycatcher

Yingling Aviation announced Monday it has received approval from the Federal Aviation Administration for work on Cessna Aircraft Co.’s Model 162 Skycatcher.



The company says it received the approval last month. It allows Yingling to maintain, inspect and alter the Skycatcher.

“This receipt of this authority represents a significant accomplishment for Yingling,” Bob Gallop, the company’s vice president of repair station operations, said in a news release. “This means we can not only perform maintenance on the airplanes, we are approved to sign off on the repairs and return them to service.”

The planes are built in China. Yingling is one of three domestic re-assembly stations.

The company has re-assembled eight of the light sport aircraft since last year.


A Mooney Girl is Born

A Mooney Girl Is Born, Final Chapter

Previously, N6619U was down in the mud pond.  I grabbed my headset and started transmitting, “This is Mooney 6619U, we are down. Mooney 6619U we need medical assistance.” And in desperation said, “Dave, can you hear me?” The antenna was buried three feet in the mud. [See A Mooney Girl Is Born, Part 3]

We heard a voice call through the trees “are you okay, do you need help?” and I answered that my father was injured and we needed an ambulance. We were transported to the local hospital, and had CAT scans, x-rays and the like. The local sheriff, who is also a pilot and was in the air at the time, came to see us. He said from the looks of the instruments, we did everything right.

We were treated and released from the hospital with only slight whiplash and lacerations. That night, my father and husband grilled salmon and steak left from the Fly-In dinner. I was very shaken up and felt guilty, to which he replied, “There were no funerals being planned.”  My father also said that this would only be a failure if I never flew again.

The next day, Dave took my father, along with the FAA Investigator to the scene of the accident and me. It was startling. Maggie had major damage to her wings, nose and tail. The trees were in shreds. Four came to rest on top of us. The cabin was unharmed. Dave crawled through the mud to help us retrieve our personal effects. My Garmin III loose in the cabin, powered up. My daughter’s laptop powered up. My father’s Walkman was playing. Not a branch, not a crack in the windshield. Only one instrument’s casing was cracked.

During the next week, there was a front page story in the Hood River news, complete with picture.   I received calls from many Hood River and The Dalles pilots with support and good wishes.  I did hear many of the rumors going around.  I heard that:
1) we flew heavy; 2) we flew with the carb heat on; 3) we flew with the parking brake on; 4) we flew with the prop out.  While none of these are the case, the rumors took a toll on me.  As a new pilot, I wanted to know what I did, or didn’t do that caused this mishap.  A few pilots even went to the crash site, or later the salvage shop, to look inside the plane to test their theories.

I received a call from the FAA investigator; he said that he had gone to The Dalles, where Maggie was taken. He and the FAA mechanic checked the cylinders. Our #1 cylinder was bad. It had gone through annual only a few months before and had 68 pounds of pressure. The best they could get was 35 and the constant reading was 25 pounds. The #2, #3, and #4 cylinders were within normal limits.  With the #1 cylinder out, the FAA calculated we would have only had 75% total power at best. He also said that he had checked my planning twice and three times to find an error. He added five pounds of clothes for each person and fifty pounds of baggage, but found we would have still been within limits. After the accident, he borrowed my knee board with all the planning. He returned it to me a few days later. He said he was impressed by the planning, how conscious we were of the weight and balance, AOPA flight planning, useful load, and weather. He indicated that he was going to send it, along with the newspaper article, into the NTSB. He had not really known of the safety features that Mooney Airplane incorporates, but was very impressed, especially in light of the impact the wings and fuselage took, while no harm came to us in the cabin.

Further, the investigator complimented my Dad and me on what safe pilots we are. In light of the second-guessing and the “what-ifs” I had been doing, this was welcome news. The cause of the accident appears to be the failure of the #1 cylinder.  It was also noted that when the #1 cylinder went down it robbed power from the remaining three cylinders.

I went flying one week after the accident. It was good to be in the air. My instructor, Dave, and I flew a Warrior up to Yakima for a very uneventful flight.  As I landed in Yakima, I realized that the skill and good luck that helped me in Hood River, would follow me in my years of flying. 

My father told me about the safety features of the Mooney that helped him decide to buy it for family use. He said they have a steel cage and roll bar in the cockpit. The POH talked about a special Z-spar design in the wings. Through the combination of providence, skill and the safety features of our Mooney, we all walked out of that mud pond.

Maggie took one for the team. She protected us, as she had done for 27 years, right to the ground. And while she is gone, there was another Mooney in our future. It is the only plane I will own.  Mooney is the only name I will trust.  On November 17th, Maggie II, a 1965 Mooney M20E was delivered to me and is based in The Dalles [KDLS]. My father reserved the number N6619U for me.  I changed the number on the M20E.  We salvaged the avionics and other instruments from Maggie I and they will be installed in my plane.

I chuckle sometimes because if I am not flying, I am thinking about flying, talking about flying or reading about flying.  I suppose once the bug has got you, it is a lifetime obsession.  I also firmly believe that the combination of my instruction, reading, and choice of aircraft  led to the very happy ending of this story.


Cluster Balloonist Jonathan Trappe

Original, Exclusive Videos from AVweb


Jonathan Trappe is a sort of super-hero to some children and a crazy man to some adults. We found him inspirational. Trappe is licensed to fly beneath a group of homemade helium-filled balloons. That means his aircraft is one of the most structurally redundant vehicles in the sky. But it's also challenging to fly. Trappe controls his direction by varying his altitude. He can drop water ballast or stab balloons with a knife to alter his buoyancy as he flies. Wind direction can vary with altitude, and Trappe uses that to his advantage, adjusting his present reality to the forecast conditions. To stay visible to controllers and aircraft, Trappe carries a radio and transponder, making him visible on radar. For visual avoidance, Trappe relies mainly on the 50-foot brightly colored canopy of balloons above his head. At night, he uses lights.


 

Aviation Consumer Flies a Silver Eagle Turbine-Converted Centurion

Original, Exclusive Videos from AVweb


Wanna go fast and climb like hell? That's what the Silver Eagle Conversion of a P210 with a Rolls Royce turbine engine does. Aviation Consumer's Paul Bertorelli recently took a flight demo in the airplane.



How the FAA Works Against Safety

AvWeb Blog

By Paul Bertorelli

I know by firsthand experience that AVweb finds its way into the upper reaches of the FAA's HQ at 800 Independence Avenue in Washington. What I don't know is this: Do the gentle people inhabiting FAA's mahogany row have a clue of how their lower minions are carrying out their jobs? Do they have even the vaguest control over the far flung offices? Do they even care? Would they be surprised to know that the FAA's actions are sometimes counter safety?

Here's where I'm going with this. For Aviation Consumer, I've been doing some extensive research on LED lighting, specifically landing lights. This is, by the way, fabulous technology. It's improving in leaps and bounds, it's getting ever cheaper and is becoming a significant market force in the general lighting market. Yet the FAA has done its level best to keep these benefits from trickling down to aviation.

Here's how: All of the manufacturers of these products have approached the FAA for some kind of approval, even though it's not clear that any is needed. The FARs are vague on the subject, requiring only that bulbs have enough light for night operations and not present a fire hazard. That's it. The venerable GE 4509 bulb—the gold standard for landing lights—carries no TSO or PMA of any kind. It's just a bulb.

Yet, say the makers of LEDs, they are often asked by regional FAA ACO offices to conduct a battery of tests on LED products to prove…to prove what? A reading of the FARs would suggest all they need to prove is that the bulb generates sufficient light and isn't a fire hazard. Even basic common sense knowledge of LEDs can answer these questions without requiring expensive tests, which one manufacturer told me ran to high five figures — and it still doesn't have the approval.

Another said its ACO insisted that the LED behave just like a 4509--same too-narrow asymmetric beam width and even the same mounting notch in the rim (wholly unnecessary). When I asked if this didn't dumb down potentially improved technology to the limitations of the old, I was told that...why yes, it does. That the product is still better than the 4509 is a testament to LED technology.

Yet another company told me its ACO refused to approve a LED bulb, refused to explain how such a product could be tested and approved and then said it was too busy to take on the project anyway. This has forced some companies to shop for ACOs that have a more realistic approach to the FAA's oversight and safety role. What that involves is an ACO culture that lucidly balances benefit against risk. In other words, any fool with a lick of sense would know that LEDs are a huge improvement over failure-prone incandescent bulbs and the risk of them causing any harm to the aircraft is too trivial to worry about.

It's probably not unreasonable to ask a manufacturer to do simple RFI trials. But even that might be overkill. At the FSDO level, some offices routinely approve Form 337 requests (good for them) for LED installs while others refuse, for no imaginable reason other than they can.

Where the FAA's actions turn strikingly counter safety is that if more LEDs were out there, pilots would tend to leave them on constantly, thus improving conspicuity and reducing the risk of mid-airs. Moreover, LEDs can easily be configured as always-on flashers—some of the products out there do that. Yet manufacturers have been reluctant to pursue the flasher approach because it complicates an already Byzantine—and entirely unnecessary—approval process. So the bottom line is, thanks to FAA actions, valuable safety technology is kept from the market for no particular reason other than bureaucratic intransigence. Even when it does make it to market, it is more expensive by dint of the make-work testing.

And by the way, if I wanted one of these LEDs for a certified airplane—and I do—I'd simply install it, approval or not. My interpretation of the FARs indicates I'm in compliance if the lamp provides sufficient light and doesn't present a fire hazard. I deem myself smart enough to determine both. Furthermore, since there's no such thing as an approved landing light bulb anyway, I'm miles away from the stench of unapproved parts. Like I said, common sense. There are little capillaries of it in the FAA, but the veins run dark with baffling illogic and flawed thinking.